beachcomber
January 24, 2008 05:03 pm
Aha I see your logic now - an AX
AND a CX.
Yep good plan, as there is no one car that will do all that we want them to do, the only alternative is a small fleet, each with specific jobs.
BTW - didn't say that I don't like BX's - I've owned several, including 1 new one as a "company car" which I indulged myself in. The BX is a good all round car - I've had diesels mainly and again mostly estates.
But absolutely NO comparison to a CX - in any department - except maybe economy. As for style, well one has it the other doesn't.
The BX to me was a utilty vehicle, not something I bought because I desired it. Today if I see a CX on the road I see the last of an iconic design, a BX passes me by, and well, it passes me by.
More aha, Masers eh? I had a Bora in the late 80's. Nice'ish car but not ever quite the supercar it pretended to be - in fact either of my Alpine GTA Turbos [ one stock, one chipped ] would have sucked it's doors off. Suffered with gearbox problems, which in the end lead to my parting with it - part exchange for a de Tomaso Pantera.
Now then - how about if everyone lists their favourite cars / vehicles for a specific task?
I've already stated, that if Citroen had ever made a LWB XM familliale, that's what I'd be driving now.
In the real World what would I like from a vehicle?
1. Utility with long distance mile munching capability and towing ability [ XM Estate ]
2. Something "exciting" - but affordable [ ALpine GTA Turbo ]
3. Economical / practical - probably a diesel C 15
then - occassionally I need a pick up, then occassionally I need the capabilty of carrying 7-8 people.
Guess it'll be quite a big fleet then! And that's before we even get started on my fleet of Bikes [ Motor, that is ].
You're quite right DerekW, it wouldn't do for us all to like the same stuff - after all, if the XM was generally valued as WE all know it should, then I for one could never have afforded models when they were only 1 , 2 years old.
Vive la difference eh.
Beachcomber