Powered by Invision Power Board

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) Resend Validation Email


  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Fenix Computer Compatibilities?, Computers
UFO
Posted: October 30, 2006 01:14 pm


Super Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 323
Member No.: 319
Joined: February 06, 2006




Hello All,

You may have been following the thread re my XM's head gasket probs, well now it has become or been diagnosed as electronic. Last night the borrowed ELIT diagnosis computer finally determined that there is a "permanent error" in the ignition computer. (see http://club-xm.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=1194&st=0)

Yesterday afternoon after having the battery recharge for 24 hours, I ran as many tests as I could without the engine running. All injection systems etc work fine, but ignition will not. The car would not even start this time on even four of the six cylinders.

I had made arrangements with a dealer to borrow a computer from their used spares stock and picked it up this afternoon (Monday). The only differences we can see/know of are:

The loaner is from a late series 1 car, my car is '96 series two
Both engines are 90deg V6 12valve
The original computer is a SIEMENS FENIX 3 BVA/SO2 9625575280 and S111700211 are the only identifiable numbers on it

The borrowed computer is a BENDIX FENIX 3 S101700201 are the numbers on this one.

Now... Can anyone advise whether the computers are compatible/swappable and reasons for or against?

If you know of a reason why the original may have failed, any info there would be helpful too. I have not taken the lid off it to look for potential problems yet.

I intend to try swapping the computers tommorow night (Tuesday) unless someone tells me there is a reason I shouldn't. I will be careful with electrical reattachment procedures too!

Your thoughts would be useful.

Thanks


--------------------
Craig Keller

'09 C5 HDi Exclusive
'74 D Special
'85 CX 25ie Pallas

Previous
'96 XM V6 Exclusive
'87 BX TRi

http://www.citroencarclub.org.au CCC of NSW Inc

http://www.citroencarclub.org.au/forum Australian Citroen Forum

http://www.aussiefrogs.com Aussiefrogs - Aussies (and others) who drive and love their French cars
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
onthecut
Posted: October 30, 2006 01:58 pm


Double Chevron
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 971
Member No.: 336
Joined: March 10, 2006




Hello UFO.

Just had a quick gander at Autodata (the aftermarket info. bible). As usual with XMs it's patchy, but the pages relating to 89 - 94 12v V6 and 94 on are definitely different. What you need to be careful about in general terms is that by connecting a different box of tricks, you don't damage existing good components and the test box itself.
I haven't got your detailed page up at the minute, but in case it wasn't on your list, there is both a crank position sensor and an RPM sensor on the later version. I strongly suggest you have a gander at www.atpelectronics.co.uk who list a precise matching replacement unit. (No, I'm not on commission with them !)

Good luck, Mike.


--------------------
XM 2.5VSX Estate RP 7185

XM 2.5VSX Estate RP 7289
PMEmail Poster
Top
xmexclusive
Posted: October 30, 2006 05:55 pm


Andre's Mate
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2877
Member No.: 144
Joined: April 06, 2005




Hi UFO

I understand your reluctance to risk swapping ECU modules particularly where they have different version codes/part numbers. A few months ago Jorgy was having ECU/immobiliser problems with his Mk1 V6. Two of us lent him working ECU's that we had tested in different V6 cars. There did not seem to be any ill effects from the various combinations we tried but we did restrict to those from a single engine type. The one I sent Jorgy was from a 92 V6 but I tried it in a 95M V6 car to check that it worked before I sent it. I now have the ECU back so will check for reference numbers when I can.

Regards

XMexc


--------------------
An interest in 2.5TD's.
Location: Hampshire, U.K.
PMEmail Poster
Top
jorgy9
Posted: October 30, 2006 06:25 pm


Andre's Mate
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1248
Member No.: 318
Joined: February 05, 2006




Yes, Fenix 3s should all be interchangeable, even between manual Vs auto box (BVM Vs BVA code). I have tried 2 different ones on my V6 and all appeared to work fine. At least for starting up and testing purposes, I didn't drive around with them.

regards
George


--------------------
XM '94 V6 12v, manual, Diravi - Mark "1.5" in black - bought: 138,000mls now: 167,000 miles
Axel '87 1.1 - real '70s Citroen handling (nope, it's not hydraulic!)


My Flickr page I ...and II


Is your XM as soft as it should be ??

...Well, again: is it ???

Mine is not as good...but quite near!


>>How I repaired my suspension part I ...and part II<<


Kilmarnock -18mls south-west of Glasgow-
PMEmail Poster
Top
Sharo
Posted: July 09, 2009 10:16 am


Active Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Member No.: 140
Joined: March 18, 2005




There is a software difference between computers. If you put a computer for automatic gearbox into car with manual, the rpm will drop very fast, which makes uncomfortable driving. Vice versa the result will be high fuel consumption (24.5 instead 12 ltr/km in the city), on the highway there is no problem.
PMEmail Poster
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 


Skin arobase par alphega @ PCentraide 2005 (original)
V1.3 par Elianora la blanche @ La Caverne de la Rose pourpre