Powered by Invision Power Board

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) Resend Validation Email


  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Other Citroens, any first hand experience
jamieb
Posted: May 04, 2007 02:42 pm


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 132
Member No.: 423
Joined: August 17, 2006




Does anyone have any experience of owning/driving AX's or anything similar? I want a 2nd hand run around/banger. I live in London and trying to fit the big beast into car parks is getting harder and harder (is it my imagination or are the spaces getting smaller?).

My first ever car was a 2CV which was a beaut but I want something that is a tad less porous and whose windows don't fly open when you go more than 50mph. I just like the look of AX's but I'm not particularly fussed.

Jamieb


--------------------
Jamieb

1998 XM: 2L Turbo Hatch VSX

1988 CX: 2.2 TRS deceased

1992 XM 2.1 Diesel Turbo
PMEmail Poster
Top
jorgy9
Posted: May 04, 2007 03:24 pm


Andre's Mate
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1248
Member No.: 318
Joined: February 05, 2006




Hi, I had an S1 AX with the 1.124cc 60hp engine. Wonderful little car. Very practical, very lively, very economical, you can "race" it if you like and it will happily follow no matter the terrain, and comfort levels super-adequate for city driving -the S2 with restyled dash even better-. It was, in my view, very ahead of its time with its focus on a wheight-reduction effort. They wheighted a bit more than 600kgs! Sadly it was born in the era when the German industry started setting the trend of making heavier and heavier cars, so you now have a Polo that needs about 150hp to move fast, Golfs that need triple turbos -at least- to break the 10" on the 0-60 biggrin.gif , and a Peugeot 2007 that weights 1 tonne with 3m73cms of length...

The Twingo is another clever little car, similarly simple and economical, and very spacious for its size, but, while being absolutely safe, its driving abilities are lower than the AX or the 106 -not responding really well to extreme driving-. But excellent for the city.

regards
George


--------------------
XM '94 V6 12v, manual, Diravi - Mark "1.5" in black - bought: 138,000mls now: 167,000 miles
Axel '87 1.1 - real '70s Citroen handling (nope, it's not hydraulic!)


My Flickr page I ...and II


Is your XM as soft as it should be ??

...Well, again: is it ???

Mine is not as good...but quite near!


>>How I repaired my suspension part I ...and part II<<


Kilmarnock -18mls south-west of Glasgow-
PMEmail Poster
Top
jamieb
Posted: May 04, 2007 05:17 pm


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 132
Member No.: 423
Joined: August 17, 2006




Thanks George. That's pretty much what I hoped hear. Years ago I had a lift in a souped up AX that went like a bomb and felt very sound. But that was when I was young. These days speed is not so much of the essence but it would be nice to have something that's nippy. I quite agree about the weightiness of small cars. And they all seem to get bigger with every upgrade.

Jamie


--------------------
Jamieb

1998 XM: 2L Turbo Hatch VSX

1988 CX: 2.2 TRS deceased

1992 XM 2.1 Diesel Turbo
PMEmail Poster
Top
wirdy
Posted: May 04, 2007 06:03 pm


Double Chevron
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 561
Member No.: 411
Joined: July 26, 2006




I had a 1.5D Ax Memphis - wonderful little car for town & country driving. Very lightweight and the bodyroll is a bit of a handful if pushed around roundabouts, but also remarkably competant on the motorway where it sat happy at 80 mph and 52mpg smile.gif

/ran it on half & half diesel / veg oil. No probs in 35k miles until sold.


--------------------
'99 'V' XM 2.0 CT VSX Auto Estate RP 8360 Green.
'97 'R' XM 2.0 CT VSX Auto Saloon RP 7480 Blue.
'96 'P' XM 2.0 16v Man Saloon RP 7176 Magenta.

Fife, Scotland.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Ken newbold
Posted: May 04, 2007 06:52 pm


Super Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 396
Member No.: 563
Joined: December 31, 2006




Get a nice 19d BX. It'll run for ever and it's too cool to steal. It's also surprising how people tend to park well away from you in car parks. wink.gif


--------------------
92 (J) 2.1TD Est. Usual Green.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Peter.N.
Posted: May 04, 2007 09:20 pm


Andre's Mate
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3414
Member No.: 78
Joined: August 31, 2004




We have a ZX 1.9 td that my wife drives, while bigger than the AX it seems very small after an XM. We have had it for nearly three years now and apart from oil changes and wiper blades I havn't put a spanner on it yet! Do get the TD though.

Peter.N.


--------------------
Used to have:

'96 'N' 2.1 td VSX manual estate White RP6695.
'01 'Y' 406 GXL Hdi 110 manual estate silver
'01 C5 estate 2.0. Hdi 110hp manual
Located in Charmouth, Dorset. U.K.

Blower transistors MJ 11015
PMEmail Poster
Top
kiwi
Posted: May 04, 2007 10:12 pm


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 125
Member No.: 86
Joined: October 29, 2004




One of our cars is a 1996 ZX 1.4, that we've had for about 8 years. It is a wonderful little car that drives well and returns good fuel economy. Has good safety - airbag, pretensioners etc. The 1.4 engine doesn't set the world on fire but it makes a great city car that is fine for the highway as well, with good ride and handling. It has a useful load area, and the rear seat slides forward in addition to folding which can be handy. I'd certainly buy another. My only gripe with our one is that it doesn't have air.

Regards,
Kiwi


--------------------
XM 2.1TD Auto RP 6632
XM V6 Auto RP 5338 with a bad headache
XM 2.0 sei Manual RP 5062
ZX 1.4
Wolseley 15/50
Several other wheeled things

Turitea Valley, Palmerston North
New Zealand
PMEmail Poster
Top
bigjohnh
Posted: May 05, 2007 09:18 am


Super Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 289
Member No.: 324
Joined: February 13, 2006




I agree that the AX is a fine little car, a friend of mine had a 1.4 XS which was a bit sporty.

BUT these cars were bought by and for youngsters and you may find it reflects badly in insurance quotes, you may even find that a bigger, more powerful BX or ZX could be cheaper to insure due to the age profile of the typical driver. I have noticed this with XM's, I get cheaper insurance for a 2.0 Turbo XM than a slow and boring smaller car.

Bizarre

John


--------------------
Currently XMless
1970 Morris Minor Traveller (SORN)
1989 Moto Morini Kanguro (2 wheels and an engine)
Fisher Fury Kit Car 1600 Ford Cross Flow (Work in progress)
SE London
PMEmail Poster
Top
XM v6 sadist
Posted: May 05, 2007 10:14 am


Super Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 262
Member No.: 232
Joined: August 20, 2005




Hi John

I had a ZX TD Aura for 6 years and it never had any problems. You can still pick them up cheap if you look around. Mechanical TD are seriously reliable plus they are good cars in town or on the motorway (we drove from Surrey to Inverness in a day in ours no problem). Plus since they are fairly light - they are quick too.

Cheers

Tony
PMEmail Poster
Top
onthecut
Posted: May 05, 2007 01:35 pm


Double Chevron
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 971
Member No.: 336
Joined: March 10, 2006




Hi John.

For a town car that's well usable on a trip, I think the AX is a cracking little package. The last 1500 diesel I had was good for 60mpg, plus cruising at 70 or 80 without too much fuss. The later ones seem more nicely finished than the early ones. One thing you will notice though are the markedly offset pedals compared to the XM. Bigjohn is spot on regarding insurance though; my last one survived two of my sprogs learning to drive in it, but come for a quote for one of them as her own car and it was £1400 ! (By comparison, she decided on joining the Land Rover side of the family and got first year insurance on a 2.5 Landy for £800 !!!! )
One issue I did have with my AX were the rear swing arm bearings, but then again, it had worked very hard ! (Dirt cheap service items as well).

Good huntinng.

Mike.


--------------------
XM 2.5VSX Estate RP 7185

XM 2.5VSX Estate RP 7289
PMEmail Poster
Top
rowanmoor
Posted: May 08, 2007 01:51 pm


Double Chevron
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 548
Member No.: 367
Joined: May 08, 2006




My indy often lends me an old AX when I take the XM in. That is always a bit of a shock when I get out of the XM and straight into the AX tongue.gif

It has seen better days, but is very economical.

The one thing I would say against it is that the peddles are in the wrong place. Every time I get in it I put my feet where I expect the clutch and accelerator to be and find that I have one foot on the brake and the other in thin air. It means your back is a bit twisted when you are driving.

Not a problem for short journeys, but worth bearing in mind if you expect to do longer journeys and have any kind of back problems/niggles.

Cheers,
Rowan.


--------------------
94M XM 2.5 TD VSX Estate RP 6430 Forest Green
Redhill, Surrey.
PMEmail Poster
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 


Skin arobase par alphega @ PCentraide 2005 (original)
V1.3 par Elianora la blanche @ La Caverne de la Rose pourpre