Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
BrendanM |
Posted: June 29, 2017 01:43 pm
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 59 Member No.: 1464 Joined: January 18, 2009 |
The Crankshaft (flywheel) sensor on my 1996 2.0i turbo Break was marked '102340-06'.
It has a resistance of 370 Ohms. This is almost certainly a Siemens or VDO sensor. The parts list says my engine (RGX XU10J2TE) needs a 1920 c3 sensor. A unit with 370 Ohm coil. These sensors are both equivalents, and there are a further 200 numbers from various manufacturers that are apparently suitable replacements. I was sold an identical looking sensor which had a resistance of 445 ohms. The internal magnet had a different polarity when I tested it with a magnetic compass. I got a refund but the vendor insisted that it was an equivalent. It was marked 14-43-14 which could be a Bougicord 144314. As the sensor is difficult to get to, I didn't want to experiment with a possibly incompatible sensor. How tolerant are engine management units to crankshaft sensors that are slightly different? |
xmexclusive |
Posted: June 30, 2017 08:31 am
|
Andre's Mate Group: Members Posts: 2877 Member No.: 144 Joined: April 06, 2005 |
Hi Brendan
Over the years seen quite a few reports of problems with that sensor. Failure to run and erratic running. Those were mostly due to correct spec sensor going out of spec. So I think you were wise to reject the one supplied. John -------------------- An interest in 2.5TD's.
Location: Hampshire, U.K. |