Powered by Invision Power Board

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) Resend Validation Email


  Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

> Crankshaft Sensor
BrendanM
Posted: June 29, 2017 01:43 pm


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 59
Member No.: 1464
Joined: January 18, 2009




The Crankshaft (flywheel) sensor on my 1996 2.0i turbo Break was marked '102340-06'.
It has a resistance of 370 Ohms.
This is almost certainly a Siemens or VDO sensor.

The parts list says my engine (RGX XU10J2TE) needs a 1920 c3 sensor. A unit with 370 Ohm coil.

These sensors are both equivalents, and there are a further 200 numbers from various manufacturers that are apparently suitable replacements.

I was sold an identical looking sensor which had a resistance of 445 ohms. The internal magnet had a different polarity when I tested it with a magnetic compass. I got a refund but the vendor insisted that it was an equivalent.

It was marked 14-43-14 which could be a Bougicord 144314.

As the sensor is difficult to get to, I didn't want to experiment with a possibly incompatible sensor.

How tolerant are engine management units to crankshaft sensors that are slightly different?
PMEmail Poster
Top
xmexclusive
Posted: June 30, 2017 08:31 am


Andre's Mate
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2877
Member No.: 144
Joined: April 06, 2005




Hi Brendan

Over the years seen quite a few reports of problems with that sensor.
Failure to run and erratic running.
Those were mostly due to correct spec sensor going out of spec.
So I think you were wise to reject the one supplied.

John


--------------------
An interest in 2.5TD's.
Location: Hampshire, U.K.
PMEmail Poster
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

 


Skin arobase par alphega @ PCentraide 2005 (original)
V1.3 par Elianora la blanche @ La Caverne de la Rose pourpre