Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
DerekW |
Posted: December 13, 2006 08:51 pm
|
Andre's Mate Group: Members Posts: 1320 Member No.: 173 Joined: June 01, 2005 |
Following on from recent discussions about comfort spheres, I decided to look at the alternatives on offer. Before that I thought it best to confirm exactly which were the correct standard ones. This is what I found:
In all references the info is given as Volume(cm3)/pressure(bars)/damper(mm). Source: Series 2 Workshop Manual. Presentation section,V6 ES9J4 engine. Front legs: 450/40/0.7 Front hydractive: 450/70/1.25* Rear: 400/30/0.6 Rear hydractive: 400/40/1.25* Source: Series 2 Workshop Manual. Section 09, suspension. Front legs: 400/50/0.6 Front hydractive: 500/70/1.25* Rear: 400/30/0.5 Rear hydractive: 400/50/1.25* Source: Series 2 Spares Manual. Front legs: 450/40/no info given. Front Hydractive: 450/70/no info given. Rear: 400/30/no info given. Rear hydractive: 400/50/no info given. Source: GSF Spares Catalogue. Front legs: 400/50/0.6 Front hydractive: 500/70/- Rear: 400/30/0.5 Rear hydractive: 400/50/- * I think these refer to the dampers in the valve block. Confusing? I think, as I said previously, that when the time comes to change them I'll go for the largest volume and highest pressures in each category. What do you think? Regards, Derek -------------------- 1999 3.0V624v Exclusive Black! (RP8362)
2004 C3 Sensodrive Exclusive 1994 ZX Aura 1.8 auto Location: 5 miles North of Boston, Lincolnshire |
jorgy9 |
Posted: December 14, 2006 04:34 am
|
Andre's Mate Group: Members Posts: 1248 Member No.: 318 Joined: February 05, 2006 |
It is confusing, although not a mistake, as Citroen has made some little tunning changes overtime on same models, e.g. my '94 V6 has 450/40 front corners while previously they had 400/45, and from '95 the spec changes again to something else. In such a case, I don't think Citroen changed anything else that affects suspension, they were just playing around with spring, damper and compliance trade offs, so it's up to me which spec I put on my car next time.
Re. your case, it is difficult to say which front corner will feel "softer", a 450/40/0.7 or a 400/50/0.6mm. The first is less damped, but it has a lower pressure, but also higher volume, which means it would is a harder sprung but less damped sphere initially, but because of the extra 50cc it gets harder at a slower rythm than the 400cc sphere, as it is compressed. Difficult to detect such fine diferences, that pertain to "hard" mode moments only, anyway. What will sure make a difference in comfort is the 2 different suggested middle ones -u r right that 1.25mm is the 2 hydractive block's tablets' orifices- so the 500/70 will be a more compliant sphere than the 450/70, i.e. it'll definitely swallow better larger bumps. regards George -------------------- XM '94 V6 12v, manual, Diravi - Mark "1.5" in black - bought: 138,000mls now: 167,000 miles
Axel '87 1.1 - real '70s Citroen handling (nope, it's not hydraulic!) My Flickr page I ...and II Is your XM as soft as it should be ?? ...Well, again: is it ??? Mine is not as good...but quite near! >>How I repaired my suspension part I ...and part II<< Kilmarnock -18mls south-west of Glasgow- |
jorgy9 |
Posted: December 14, 2006 04:38 am
|
Andre's Mate Group: Members Posts: 1248 Member No.: 318 Joined: February 05, 2006 |
ps
Isn't it amazing though that, with a bit of research, we can play and totally transform the road-holding setup of our cars for a few tenners, at home, in 10mins (OK, 10mins for the front only) !! G -------------------- XM '94 V6 12v, manual, Diravi - Mark "1.5" in black - bought: 138,000mls now: 167,000 miles
Axel '87 1.1 - real '70s Citroen handling (nope, it's not hydraulic!) My Flickr page I ...and II Is your XM as soft as it should be ?? ...Well, again: is it ??? Mine is not as good...but quite near! >>How I repaired my suspension part I ...and part II<< Kilmarnock -18mls south-west of Glasgow- |